َAndisheha-ye Huquq-e Omumi, Volume 13, Issue 1, No 24, Year 2024, Pages 27-53

    Analysis of Power Relations and International Law within the Framework of Order Theory: An Approach to Distinguishing Between Pure International Law and Internationalized Law

    Article Type: 
    Research
    Writers:
    ✍️ Mohammadreza Alipour / Assistant Professor in the Department of International Law, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran / dr.alipour@iau.ac.ir
    mahmoud bagheri / PhD Student in International Law, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran / dr.mbagheri@iau.ac.ir
    27-53 2025/03/04 2025/09/27 2024/03/05
    dor 20.1001.1.24235725.1402.13.1.2.9
    doi 10.22034/hoghoughi.2025.5001316✓
    Abstract: 
    The complex relationship between power and international law and its function in the service of domination or resistance is one of the fundamental issues in international relations and law theories. The aim of this research is to analyze this problematic relationship from the perspective of "Order Theory" and to introduce the conceptual distinction between "internationalized law" and "pure international law." The research method is descriptive-analytical and based on the conceptual framework of order theory. Accordingly, international law is a product of the intrinsic need for order in international relations, and its formation, continuity, and evolution occur through the dynamic interaction between power, fixed normative principles, and the agency of international actors; thus, it reflects the hegemony of rulers and the resistance of others. The findings show that "pure international law" is formed based on the consent and equality of actors in the international system and has gained validity and legitimacy relatively independently of the unilateral exercise of power by states. In contrast, "internationalized law" represents actions through institutional mechanisms that violate peremptory norms, universality, state consent, or equality. These concepts make it possible to distinguish between the legitimate exercise of power and its abuse by rulers, providing a criterion for assessing legal validity and a basis for challenging it.
    Keywords: 
    Power
    International Law
    critical approaches
    order theory
    resistance
    rulers
    internationalized law
    چکیده و کلیدواژه فارسی (Persian)
    Title :واکاوی مناسبات قدرت و حقوق بین‌الملل در چارچوب نظریة نظم‌گرایی؛ رهیافتی به تمایز حقوق بین‌الملل خالص و حقوق بین‌المللی‌شده
    Abstract: 
    رابطۀ پیچیده میان قدرت و حقوق بین‌الملل و کارکرد آن در خدمت سلطه یا مقاومت، از مسائل بنیادین نظریه‌های روابط و حقوق بین‌الملل است. هدف پژوهش واکاوی این رابطۀ مسئله‌برانگیز از منظر نظریۀ «نظم‌گرایی» و معرفی تمایز مفهومی «حقوق بین‌المللی‌شده» در برابر «حقوق بین‌الملل خالص» است. روش تحقیق توصیفی ـ تحلیلی و مبتنی‌بر چارچوب مفهومی نظم‌گرایی است. بر این اساس، حقوق بین‌الملل محصول نیاز ذاتی به نظم در مناسبات بین‌المللی است و شکل‌گیری، تداوم و تحول آن در تعامل پویا میان قدرت، اصول ثابت هنجاری و کنشگری بازیگران بین‌المللی صورت می‌گیرد؛ ازاین‌رو بازتاب‌دهندۀ هژمونی حکمرانان و مقاومت سایرین است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد «حقوق بین‌الملل خالص» بر پایۀ رضایت و برابری بازیگران نظام بین‌الملل شکل گرفته و به‌طور نسبی مستقل از اعمال یک‌جانبۀ قدرت‌ها اعتبار و وجاهت یافته است. در مقابل «حقوق بین‌المللی‌شده» بیانگر اقداماتی از طریق سازوکارهای نهادی است که قواعد آمره، عام‌الشمول، رضایت و یا برابری دولت‌ها را نقض می‌کند. این مفاهیم امکان تمیز میان اعمال مشروع و سوء‌استفاده از قدرت توسط حکمرانان را فراهم آورده و سنجه‌ای برای ارزیابی اعتبار حقوقی و زمینه‌ساز به ‌چالش ‌کشیده ‌شدن آن است.
    Keywords: 
    قدرت
    حقوق بین‌الملل
    رویکردهای انتقادی
    نظریۀ نظم‌گرایی
    مقاومت
    حکمرانان
    حقوق بین‌المللی‌شده
    References: 
    • Acharya, A. (2014). Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds. International Studies Quarterly, 58, 647-659. 
    • Aksar, Yusuf. International Economic Law, In Implementing International Economic Law, 5-49. Leiden: Brill, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004203846-003.
    • Allott, P. (1999). The Concept of International Law. European Journal of International Law, 10, 31-50. 
    • Alshdaifat, S. A. (2017). A visible theme in the history of international law: international or global? International Journal of Public Law and Policy, 6(1),54-77.‏ 
    • Alter, K. (2014). The new terrain of international law: Courts, politics, rights. Princeton University Press. 
    • Anghie, A. (2006). The evolution of international law: colonial and postcolonial realities. Third World Quarterly, 27(5),739-753.‏ 
    • Anghie, A. (2007). Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law (Vol. 37). Cambridge University Press. 
    • Arend, A. (1999). Legal Rules and International Society. 
    • Aznagulova, G. & Pashentsev, D. (2023). Ontological Grounds of International Law. WISDOM. 
    • Bantekas, I. & Papastavridis, E. (2013). 1. The nature of international law and the international legal system. International Law Concentrate. 
    • Barnett, M. & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in International Politics. International Organization, 59, 39-75. 
    • Batta, R. (2023). Dismantling the Panoptical Narrative of the Doctrine of Discovery: A Critical Study of the Symbolic Misrepresentation of First Nations People. Literary Voice, 88-98.‏ 
    • Baxi, U. (2006). What may the 'Third World' expect from international law?. Third World Quarterly, 27, 713-725. 
    • Beard, J. L., & Pahuja, S. (2003). Divining the Source: Law's Foundation and the Question of Authority. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 19.‏ 
    • Bergsmo, M., Kaleck, W. & Hlaing, K. Y. (2020). Colonial wrongs and access to international law. Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher.‏ 
    • Berman, N. (2011). Passion and ambivalence: Colonialism, nationalism, and international law (Vol. 6). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 
    • Burke-White, W. (2015). Power Shifts in International Law: Structural Realignment and Substantive Pluralism. Harvard International Law Journal, 56, 1-79. 
    • Butt, D. (2013). Colonialism and postcolonialism.‏ 
    • Caradon, H. (1985). The Security Council as an Instrument for Peace. In Multilateral Negotiation and Mediation (p. 3-13). Pergamon.‏ 
    • Carty, A. (1991). Critical International Law: Recent Trends in the Theory of International Law. European Journal of International Law, 2, 66-96. 
    • Castanha, T. (2015). The doctrine of discovery: The legacy and continuing impact of Christian discovery on American Indian populations. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 39(3).‏ 
    • Chhabra, A. (2012). Autumnal Rage: Playing with Islamic Fire. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 34, 389. 
    • Cope, K., Verdier, P. & Versteeg, M. (2021). The Global Evolution of Foreign Relations Law. American Journal of International Law, 116, 1-57. 
    • Cuddy, B. (2019). International Law and US Foreign Relations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History. 
    • De La Rasilla, I. (2021). International Law and History: Modern Interfaces (Vol. 152). Cambridge University Press.‏ 
    • de Sousa Santos, B. (1995). Toward a new common sense: Law, science, and politics in the paradigmatic transition (Vol. 454). New York: Routledge.‏ 
    • Dupuy, P. (2005). Some Reflections on Contemporary International Law and the Appeal to Universal Values: A Response to Martti Koskenniemi. European Journal of International Law, 16, 131-137. 
    • Eide, A. (1974). VALUE-BASED APPROACH-METHODS AND PROBLEMS IN PEACE RESEARCH. International Social Science Journal, 26(1), 119-133.‏ 
    • Eslava, L. & Pahuja, S. (2012). Beyond the (Post) Colonial: TWAIL and the Everyday Life of International Law, 45, 195-221. 
    • Fassbender, B. (2002). Stories of War and Peace On Writing the History of International Law in the 'Third Reich'and After. European Journal of International Law, 13(2), 479-512.‏ 
    • Feinerman, J. (1989). The Chinese Challenge to Universality. Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 83, 556-558. 
    • Fitzpatrick, P. (2003). 'Gods would be needed…': American Empire and the Rule of (International) Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 16, 429-466. 
    • Gasteyer, S., & Flora, C. (2000). Modernizing the savage: Colonization and perceptions of landscape and lifescape. Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 128-149. 
    • Gathii, J. (1998). International Law and Eurocentricity. European Journal of International Law, 9, 184-211. 
    • Gavrilov, V. (2019). Russian Approaches to International Law by Lauri MÄLKSOO. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. xii + 228 p. Paperback: £29.99. Asian Journal of International Law, 9, 393-393. 
    • Gibson, L. (2012). Ethics from the Other Side: Postcolonial, Lay, and Feminist Contributions to Anglican Ethics. Anglican theological review, 94, 639. 
    • Gismondi, M. D. (2007). Ethics, liberalism and realism in international relations (Vol. 61). Routledge.‏ 
    • Goodrich, L. (1958). The UN Security Council. International Organization, 12, 273 - 287. 
    • Greenberg, J. (2016). The Doctrine of Discovery as a Doctrine of Domination. Journal for The Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 10, 236-244. 
    • Grewe, Wilhelm G. The epochs of international law. Walter de Gruyter, 2013.‏ 
    • Haokip, P., M, M. & Haokip, D. (2022). Effects of the Doctrine of Discovery: A Strive to Build Sustainable and Peaceful Communities in North East India. ECS Transactions. 
    • Haskell, J. (2014). TRAIL-ing TWAIL: Arguments and Blind Spots in Third World Approaches to International Law. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 27, 383-414. 
    • Higgins, D. (1999). International Law in a Changing International System. Cambridge Law Journal, 58, 78-95. 
    • Hoffmann, S. (1961). International Systems and International Law. World Politics, 14, 205-237. 
    • Hooker, M. (1972). The Future of Law in a Multicultural World . By Adda B. Bozeman. [Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press: London: Oxford University Press. 1971. xvii and 229 p. £3.15.]. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 21, 813-814. 
    • Ikejiaku, B. (2014). International Law is Western Made Global Law: The Perception of Third-World Category. African Journal of Legal Studies, 6, 337-356. 
    • Jabyn, M. (2017). Reflections on Boaventura de Sousa Santos's Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization and Emancipation, 2nd edn-Reviews on Boaventura de Sousa Santos, Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition (New York: Routledge, 1995). International Journal of Law in Context, 13(4), 570-573.‏ 
    • Jackson, R. (1987). Quasi-states, dual regimes, and neoclassical theory: International jurisprudence and the Third World. International Organization, 41, 519-549. 
    • Jacobs, D. (2006). What Is an International Rule of Law. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 30, 3. 
    • Johnston, D. (1989). Functionalism in the Theory of International Law. Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international, 26, 3-60. 
    • Jumarang, B. K. (2011). Realism and Liberalism in International Relations. E-International Relations.‏ 
    • Kahn, P. W. (2000). Speaking law to power: popular sovereignty, human rights, and the new international order. Chi. J. Int'l. L., 1, 1.‏ 
    • Kemmerer, A. (2006). Conference Report - Global Fragmentations: A Note on the Biennial Conference of the European Society of International Law (Paris, la Sorbonne, 18 - 20 May 2006). German Law Journal, 7, 729-733. 
    • Khan, B., & Rahman, M. (2021). Glimpses of international law discourse. 15-25. 
    • Koskenniemi, M. (2004). International law and hegemony: a reconfiguration. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(2), 197-218. 
    • Koskenniemi, M. (2018). 2. What is International Law For?. International Law. 
    • Krasner, S. (2002). Realist Views of International Law. Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 96, 265-268. 
    • Krisch, N. (2005). International law in times of hegemony: unequal power and the shaping of the international legal order. European Journal of International Law, 16(3), 369-408.‏ 
    • Kumm, M. (2004). The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis. European Journal of International Law, 15, 907-931. 
    • Latipulhayat, A. (2020). New Face of International Law From Western to Global Construct, 07, 43-63. 
    • Lee, H. E., & Lee, S. (2018). Positivism in International Law: State Sovereignty, Self-Determination, and Alternative Perspectives. In Asian Yearbook of International Law, Volume 16 (2010) (p. 1-24). Brill Nijhoff.‏ 
    • Mälksoo, L. (2019). Civilizational Diversity as Challenge to the (False) Universality of International Law. Asian Journal of International Law, 9, 155-164. 
    • Matsumoto, F. (2019). The End of the History of Liberalism and the Last Transcivilizational Man? Onuma's Attempt to Define a New International Law. Asian Journal of International Law, 9, 185-193. 
    • McNeil, K. (2015). The Doctrine of Discovery Reconsidered: Reflecting on Discovering Indigenous Lands: The Doctrine of Discovery in the English Colonies.‏ 
    • McQueen, A. (2015). On Hans J. Morgenthau's The Twilight of International Morality. Ethics, 125(3), 840-842.‏ 
    • Mignolo, W. (2003). The darker side of the Renaissance: Literacy, territoriality, and colonization. University of Michigan Press. 
    • Mignolo, W. D. & Walsh, C. E. (2018). On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Duke University Press. 
    • Miller, R. & Hobbs, H. (2023). Unraveling the International Law of Colonialism: Lessons from Australia and the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal. 
    • Monte, I. (2016). The Pen is Mightier than the H-Bomb. Interventions, 18, 669-686. 
    • Morgenthau, H. & Nations, P. A. (1948). The struggle for power and peace. Nova York, Alfred Kopf. 
    • Morgenthau, H. J. (1973). Politics among nations.‏ 
    • Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2014). Global coloniality and the challenges of creating African futures. The Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 36(2).‏ 
    • O'Casey, E. (2011). Ethics and International Relations. Politics, Religion & Ideology, 12, 113-114. 
    • O'Mahony, C. (2012). There is no such thing as a right to dignity. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10, 551-574. 
    • Onuf, N. (1990). From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. By Martti Koskenniemi. Helsinki: Lakimiesliiton Kustannus, Finnish Lawyers' Publishing Company, 1989. Pp. xxvi, 550. Index. FIM 275. American Journal of International Law, 84(3), 771-775.‏ 
    • Onuma Yasuaki (2010). A transcivilizational perspective on international law: Questioning prevalent cognitive frameworks in the emerging multi-polar and multi-civilizational world of the twenty-first century (Vol. 342). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.‏ 
    • Onuma Yasuaki. (2014). Multi-Civilizational International Law in the Multi-Centric 21st Century World: Transformation of West-Centric to Global International Law as Seen from a Trans-Civilizational Perspective. In The Roots of International Law/Les fondements du droit international (p. 597-640).by Brill Nijhoff 
    • Onyishi, A. & Okou, F. (2017). THE CRISES IN THE THEORY OF LAW: MUNICIPAL, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE MODERN STATES, 2, 83-90. 
    • Pagden, A. (2003). Human Rights, Natural Rights, And Europe's Imperial Legacy. Political Theory, 31, 171-199. 
    • Pahuja, S. (2005). The postcoloniality of international law. Harvard International Law Journal, 46, 459-470. 
    • Quijano, A. (2007). COLONIALITY AND MODERNITY/RATIONALITY. Cultural Studies, 21, 168-178. 
    • Quijano, A. & Ennis, M. (2000). Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1, 533-580. 
    • Rai, H. (2022). Colonial Wrongs and Access to International Law edited by Morten BERGSMO, Wolfgang KALECK, and Kyaw Yin HLAING. Brussels: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2020, xxx + 622 pp. Hardcover: £34.76. doi: unknown. Asian Journal of International Law, 13, 195-196. 
    • Rajagopal, B. (2003). International law from below: Development, social movements and third world resistance. Cambridge University Press. 
    • Rajagopal, B. (2006). Counter-hegemonic International Law: rethinking human rights and development as a Third World strategy. Third World Quarterly, 27, 767-783. 
    • Riebe, L. (2020). Worldmaking after empire: the rise and fall of self-determination.‏ 
    • Rietzler, K. (2016). Counter-imperial orientalism: Friedrich Berber and the politics of international law in Germany and India, 1920s–1960s*. Journal of Global History, 11, 113 - 134. 
    • Ringmar, E. (1995). The relevance of international law: a Hegelian interpretation of a peculiar seventeenth-century preoccupation. Review of International Studies, 21, 87-103. 
    • Rovira, M. & Amorosa, P. (2017). Introduction. Leiden Journal of International Law, 30, 799 - 800. 
    • Ruskola, T. (2016). China in the Age of the World Picture. 
    • Schachter, O. (1999). The Role of Power in International Law. Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 93, 200-205. 
    • Schreuer, C. (1993). The Waning of the Sovereign State: Towards a New Paradigm for International-Law? European Journal of International Law, 4, 447-471. 
    • Scobbie, I. (2013). Redefining European Tradition. Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 107, 382 - 385. 
    • Scott, S. (1994). International Law as Ideology: Theorizing the Relationship between International Law and International Politics. European Journal of International Law, 5, 313-325. 
    • Shany, Y. (2012). Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach. American Journal of International Law, 106, 225-270. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.106.2.0225. 
    • Slaughter, A. (1995). International Law in a World of Liberal States. European Journal of International Law, 6, 503-538. 
    • Sourgens, F. G. (2006). Positivism, Humanism, and Hegemony: Sovereignty and Security for Our Time. Penn St. Int'l L. Rev, 25, 433.‏ 
    • Starski, P., & Kämmerer, J. A. (2017). Imperial Colonialism in the Genesis of International Law–Anomaly or Time of Transition? Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d'histoire du droit international, 19(1), 50-69.‏ 
    • Steinberg, R., & Zasloff, J. (2006). Power and International Law. American Journal of International Law, 100, 64-87. 
    • Talmon, S. (2005). The Security Council as World Legislature. American Journal of International Law, 99, 175-193. 
    • Udiani, M., Mangku, D. & Yuliartini, N. (2022). HUKUM INTERNASIONAL SEBAGAI SUMBER HUKUM DI DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA INTERNASIONAL. Ganesha Law Review. 
    • von Bernstorff, J. (2019). The decay of the international rule of law project (1990–2015).‏ 
    • Waltz, K. N. (2010). Theory of international politics. Waveland Press. 
    • Wen-bin, L. (2006). The Great Power and International Law. Journal of Shangqiu Vocational and Technical College. 
    • Witte, B. (2011). Using International Law for the European Union's Domestic Affairs. 133-156. 
    • Xie, Y. (2024). The Function of International Law in Modern International Relations: A Constructivist Perspective. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media. 
    • YILDIZ, E. Ç. (2023). Postcolonial Approaches to International Human Rights Law: The TWAIL Case. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 43(1), 353-369.‏
    • 322 reads
    Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
    Cite this article: RIS Mendeley BibTeX APA MLA HARVARD VANCOUVER

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Alipour, Mohammadreza, bagheri, mahmoud. (2024) Analysis of Power Relations and International Law within the Framework of Order Theory: An Approach to Distinguishing Between Pure International Law and Internationalized Law. َAndisheha-ye Huquq-e Omumi, 13(1), 27-53 https://doi.org/10.22034/hoghoughi.2025.5001316.

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Mohammadreza Alipour; mahmoud bagheri."Analysis of Power Relations and International Law within the Framework of Order Theory: An Approach to Distinguishing Between Pure International Law and Internationalized Law". َAndisheha-ye Huquq-e Omumi, 13, 1, 2024, 27-53

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Alipour, M, bagheri, M.(2024) 'Analysis of Power Relations and International Law within the Framework of Order Theory: An Approach to Distinguishing Between Pure International Law and Internationalized Law', َAndisheha-ye Huquq-e Omumi, 13(1), pp. 27-53

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Alipour, M, bagheri, M. Analysis of Power Relations and International Law within the Framework of Order Theory: An Approach to Distinguishing Between Pure International Law and Internationalized Law. َAndisheha-ye Huquq-e Omumi, 2024; 13(1): 27-53