اندیشه‌های حقوق عمومی

The system of constitutional monarchy is founded on three basic principles: firstly, in this system, the political power of the monarch is conditional upon and constrained by law; the rule of law and legal institutions have replaced personal sovereignty. Secondly, in a constitutional system, legislative powers do not fall within the purview of the monarch but are delegated to a parliament composed of the people's representatives. Thirdly, the executive powers of the king are delegated to a prime minister or a council of ministers who are responsible for their actions and decisions to the people's representatives, ensuring the optimal flow of popular sovereignty. Consequently, in a monarchical system where the above three principles are observed, the king, as the head of state, gains entirely ceremonial powers and a purely symbolic role. Since the United Kingdom has a constitutional monarchy system, it is often claimed that the British monarch holds a purely ceremonial and symbolic role in the country's political system. This article, using library resources and a descriptive-analytical method, aims to examine and analyze the aforementioned claim regarding the position and powers of the British monarch. The investigations conducted in this article indicate that the British monarch possesses powers that violate the three aforementioned principles concerning constitutional monarchy systems; therefore, the claim of this position being ceremonial and symbolic in the UK political system does not appear entirely accurate and is subject to challenge and critique.